Content
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,160 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: "A First Look at Bhagwan Incense"
|
||||
description: "Taking a look at Bhagwan Incense and the brand's Absolute Oudh, Oudh, Oudh Majestic, Royal Oudh, Royal Mysore Sandalwood, and Sandalwood Origins sticks."
|
||||
date: 2026-07-18
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- Incense
|
||||
- Incense Review
|
||||
synopsis: "Taking a look at Bhagwan Incense and the brand's Absolute Oudh, Oudh, Oudh Majestic, Royal Oudh, Royal Mysore Sandalwood, and Sandalwood Origins sticks."
|
||||
imageURL: /img/a-first-look-at-bhagwan/lighting-a-stick-of-bhagwan-absolute-oudh.webp
|
||||
imageAlt: "A close up of a stick of incense being lit with a flame on a wick. The end of the stick appears wet with oil from the heat."
|
||||
mastodon_id: "116942744227037345"
|
||||
---
|
||||
When Eugene of [Bhagwan Incense](https://bhagwan-incense.com/) first reached out offering samples I was hesitant to accept them; my experiences with Indian style incense at that point had been less than stellar. After Irene of rauchfahne.de sent me some very nice Indian sticks, however, my mind was opened, and I found myself keen to see what Bhagwan has to offer.
|
||||
|
||||
Being an exporter rather than a manufacturer, Bhagwan's product range is fairly broad, spanning from classic sandalwood sticks to modern fragrances like guava. Today I'll start with my thoughts on some of those classic incense fragrances: agarwood and sandalwood.
|
||||
|
||||
## Agarwood
|
||||
|
||||
### Absolute Oudh
|
||||
|
||||
Absolute Oudh is sweet, spicy, woody, and "masculine." Baking spice notes
|
||||
almost remind me of a Japanese sweet agarwood stick, but the sweetness is
|
||||
really ramped up here and there's no camphor lift. There is a vanillic aspect
|
||||
to this stick, which, coupled with the sweetness, evokes benzoin. There is also
|
||||
something of a Play-Doh note, a touch of anise in the room, and an accord
|
||||
reminiscent of cola. Amidst all of the sweetness and spice, there is an
|
||||
agarwood je ne sais quoi - that earthy, sticky fragrance that is close to
|
||||
impossible to describe unless you've smelled it. Buried in this fragrance is
|
||||
something rather true to life. While Absolute Oudh is certainly not in the same
|
||||
category as a single-origin agarwood-plus-binder stick, it is a pleasant,
|
||||
well-composed stick with a recognizable agarwood character.
|
||||
|
||||
### Oudh
|
||||
|
||||
The unlit stick is very sweet, woody, creamy, and spicy. For some reason this
|
||||
is a very nostalgic fragrance for me. Despite how luscious and creamy the unlit
|
||||
stick smelled, the character of the fragrance in the burn is lighter, with
|
||||
notes of smoke, roasting coffee, light spice, vanilla, coumarin, dried fruit,
|
||||
and blonde tobacco. It's one of the more genteel oud fragrances from Bhagwan
|
||||
that I've sampled. Up close, there is a whisper of a dry, sour, woody note that
|
||||
reminds me of low grade agarwood, but without the acrid note that comes with
|
||||
real wood. If I hadn't read "Oudh" on the packaging, however, I probably
|
||||
wouldn't have guessed that this was intended to be an agarwood stick. That
|
||||
said, I like this fragrance a lot more than most of the low-grade
|
||||
agarwood-forward senkō in my collection.
|
||||
|
||||
[ for the animated webp tutorial.")](/img/a-first-look-at-bhagwan/bhagwan-incense-absolute-oud-lighting-loop.webp)
|
||||
|
||||
### Oudh Majestic
|
||||
|
||||
The fragrance of the unlit stick is interesting. It strikes me as
|
||||
gourmand—sweet and vanillic, with baking spice, banana custard, and white musk
|
||||
notes. When lit, the fragrance is light and sweet, with notes of turbinado
|
||||
sugar, vanilla, a floral aspect, and a grassy, cinnamon-coumarin warmth. I like
|
||||
this fragrance a lot, but I'm really not even being reminded of agarwood. This stick was also reviewed on [rauchfahne.de](https://blog.rauchfahne.de/en/2024/10/05/bhagwan-oudh-majestic-en/) and [ORS](https://olfactoryrescueservice.wordpress.com/2023/11/10/bhagwan-incense-balsamic-amber-frank-rose-garden-of-eden-oudh-majestic-woody-champa-notes-on-other-fragrances/).
|
||||
|
||||
### Royal Oudh
|
||||
|
||||
The unlit stick smells sweet, tart, and earthy, with notes of dried plum, white
|
||||
musk, and spikenard. In the burn, the fragrance leans more eathy, mineral,
|
||||
woody, and spicy, with metallic sandalwood and clove notes alongside damp soil
|
||||
and dried fruit. The combined effect is a rich, complex fragrance that is, for
|
||||
me, *somewhat* evocative of warming kynam on heater. This sweet, fruity, spicy,
|
||||
and earthy scent is something I imagine might be really pleasant on a rainy
|
||||
afternoon. This stick was also reviewed on [ORS](https://olfactoryrescueservice.wordpress.com/2024/11/12/bhagwan-incense-amber-oudh-assam-agarwood-imperial-oudh-oudh-rose-royal-oudh/).
|
||||
|
||||
## Sandalwood
|
||||
|
||||
### Royal Mysore Sandalwood
|
||||
|
||||
Buttery sandalwood on the stick, with fruity and white floral notes. The
|
||||
fragrance is much louder and more complex than putting sandalwood chips on a
|
||||
burner, but the sandalwood note is lactonic, warm, and woody with that
|
||||
distinctive metallic note that I often notice from S. album. Compared to
|
||||
heating sandalwood chips, the stick is much more lively, with a distinctive
|
||||
fruitiness[^1] coming through in the burn. This isn't something I've noticed
|
||||
from wood chips, but maybe this is a common feature of certain sandalwood oils,
|
||||
or sandalwood accords? In any case, I wouldn't call this a strictly one-note
|
||||
sandalwood fragrance; unlike, say, Shunkohdo's Sarasoju, it definitely has some
|
||||
additional complexity. It is very pleasant though, and I would say that if you
|
||||
are looking for a vivacious and moderately bright composition with a fairly
|
||||
true to life sandalwood core, you can't go wrong with this. This stick was also reviewed on [ORS](https://olfactoryrescueservice.wordpress.com/2024/12/06/bhagwan-incense-imperial-sandalwood-royal-mysore-sandalwood-royal-sandalwood-sandalwood-origins/).
|
||||
|
||||
### Sandalwood Origins
|
||||
|
||||
The fragrance on the unlit stick is very perfumey. Another nostalgic scent,
|
||||
this one brings me right back to visiting Earthbound Trading Co. in the mall
|
||||
years ago. It's vanillic, floral, and woody, with a bright, soapy, white-musk
|
||||
note. The stick starts off very buttery, with some burning-oil off-notes up
|
||||
close that mostly disappear in the room. It's far sweeter than Royal Mysore
|
||||
Sandalwood, with a marked vanilla note. The floral fragrance from the unlit
|
||||
stick becomes somewhat subtle in the burn, with the very bright, soapy
|
||||
fragrance from the unlit stick transforming into something much more mellow.
|
||||
This is closer to a single-note stick; it reminds me of the super lactonic
|
||||
sandalwood note from Fred Soll's Frankincense and Sandalwood. I personally
|
||||
prefer this one over Royal Mysore Sandalwood as—in my opinion—it's closer to
|
||||
the wood itself. This stick was also reviewed on [ORS](https://olfactoryrescueservice.wordpress.com/2024/12/06/bhagwan-incense-imperial-sandalwood-royal-mysore-sandalwood-royal-sandalwood-sandalwood-origins/).
|
||||
|
||||
## Conclusion & Brand Impressions
|
||||
### Accuracy Vs. Composition
|
||||
I was once warming sandalwood on an incense heater, when my Indian
|
||||
houseguest—accustomed to agarbatti—mentioned that the genuine article didn't
|
||||
smell at all like sandalwood to her. If you're coming from the world of
|
||||
higher-end East Asian incense, or you're expecting natural, single-note wood
|
||||
fragrances, you may be similarly confused when lighting up one of these sticks
|
||||
from Bhagwan. They are each compositions, fairly far removed from the fragrance
|
||||
of the woods they are named after. This is not a knock; it's completely par for
|
||||
the course in the world of Indian incense. But I think it's worth mentioning
|
||||
that you're not going to be able to learn what actual woods smell like from
|
||||
these sticks. That said, the compositions are killer.
|
||||
|
||||
### Strength
|
||||
If you're used to gentle Japanese sticks, you're in for a shock with Bhagwan.
|
||||
Not one stick I have tried so far could be described as remotely quiet. In the
|
||||
past, I've counted this as an unequivocal downside, but things have changed for
|
||||
me in that regard. I'm learning to modulate ventilation to make these sticks
|
||||
manageable. If, like me, you have a sensitive nose, you may want to burn them
|
||||
in front of an open window, in an adjacent room, and/or with lots of fans going
|
||||
to keep the fragrance from concentrating too much in one area. While I'm
|
||||
getting used to these workarounds, I still wish Bhagwan offered minis that
|
||||
produced a more manageable amount of fragrance. In addition, I sometimes like
|
||||
to burn a variety of sticks throughout the day, but that's tough when one stick
|
||||
is powerful enough to linger for up to multiple days (looking at you, *Guava*).
|
||||
|
||||
### Ingredients & Transparency
|
||||
One thing I really would like to see improve is the way the "vegan" designation
|
||||
is used on the website. Descriptions often contain two points: "free
|
||||
from animal-derived ingredients," and "vegan incense sticks unless honey is
|
||||
mentioned in the description." This can be confusing, especially when honey or
|
||||
propolis notes are then mentioned in the description. The customer is left to
|
||||
wonder whether these are just notes, or reflect the inclusion of animal
|
||||
secretions in the product. As a vegan, clarity and confidence when making a
|
||||
purchasing decision is paramount.
|
||||
|
||||
On ingredients, Bhagwan's
|
||||
[website claims](https://bhagwan-incense.com/our-story/) that the brand offers "only premium masala incense made using pure raw halmaddi, sandalwood powder,
|
||||
essential oils and attars," and continues: "if a supplier starts using chemical
|
||||
ingredients, we stop offering their incense." This may well be a reflection of
|
||||
my own ignorance, but I don't know how it is possible to offer some of the
|
||||
fragrances in Bhagwan's catalog without synthetics. The strength, clarity, and
|
||||
staying power of some of these fragrances[^2] is truly remarkable, and they are
|
||||
clearly fairly precise, complex, and professional compositions without the
|
||||
'muddiness' that you would expect from naturals—each containing thousands of
|
||||
fragrance molecules. To be clear: I don't care if the incense I burn contains
|
||||
synthetics. I'm under no illusion that Tennendo's *Kyara* or *Sumire* is made
|
||||
with ground-up herbs and spices[^3]. I guess what I'm saying here is that these
|
||||
sticks are, in my opinion, perhaps *suspiciously good* to meet the description on the website, such that I do wonder just how much of a handle
|
||||
Bhagwan has on what is actually going into them. But, then again, I'm
|
||||
just some guy with a blog.
|
||||
|
||||
### Conclusion
|
||||
To be clear: the compositional nature and strength of these sticks are not marks against them; they're simply hallmarks of this style of incense. And if you can get past that (or if—like many—you *prefer* it), I think it's hard to go wrong with any of the sticks I've written about above. While Indian incense has a bit of a reputation problem here in the U.S.A., this incense is in an entirely different league than the bamboo-cored sticks you're likely to find in a US supermarket or gas station. For me, the sticks have been a nice change of pace from my (predominantly Japanese) incense collection, and I've been enjoying them quite a lot. It only makes sense that there should be something quite special about the work of a people who have had access to an abundance of aromatics for millennia, and it's nice to discover brands that seem to be doing a good job of curating what reaches our shores.
|
||||
|
||||
[^1]: The fruit note reminds me of the Supreme Sandalwood Science fragrance
|
||||
from Phoenix Artisan Accoutrements.
|
||||
|
||||
[^2]: Not to mention the color of the melnoorva / powder on some of the sticks.
|
||||
|
||||
[^3]: "But Nathan, some of these chemicals are endocrine disrupt…" Cool, but
|
||||
I'm not freebasing them. I think I'll be okay.
|
||||
@@ -12,8 +12,6 @@ tags:
|
||||
imageURL: /img/seitan.webp
|
||||
imageAlt: Two wee logs of seitan wrapped tightly in cheesecloth and kitchen twine on a piece of foil next top a pair of kitchen tongs.
|
||||
---
|
||||
[.")](/img/seitan.webp)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Seitan: carnists tremble at the sight of it, and sadly, due to the difficulty in its culinary execution, so do many of my fellow leaf-loving, tofu-eating, [nooch](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nutritional_yeast)-sprinkling vegans. Little known in the west, seitan is a food comprised almost entirely of wheat gluten that was invented hundreds of years ago by Buddhist monks as a protein-rich meat substitute. While fundamentally a simple dough of wheat gluten and water, then steamed or simmered, seitan is notoriously tricky to get right. Even here in Chicago where there are a wealth of vegan restaurants, some of which have been operating for decades, there is a dearth of good seitan; too chewy, not chewy enough, spongy, and flavorless seitan is endemic to the western vegan foodservice canon. Now, I'm no expert, but I've certainly picked up a few tricks over the years, and I prefer my seitan to just about any restaurant here in Chicago, with a single exception, *but I'll spill that tea at the end*.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user